Automated Certificate of Insurance Audits: Ensuring Compliance and Reducing Third-Party Risk — General Liability & Construction, Property & Homeowners (for Contractual Risk Managers)

Automated Certificate of Insurance Audits: Ensuring Compliance and Reducing Third-Party Risk — General Liability & Construction, Property & Homeowners (for Contractual Risk Managers)
At Nomad Data we help you automate document heavy processes in your business. From document information extraction to comparisons to summaries across hundreds of thousands of pages, we can help in the most tedious and nuanced document use cases.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Automated Certificate of Insurance Audits: Ensuring Compliance and Reducing Third-Party Risk — General Liability & Construction, Property & Homeowners

Contractual Risk Managers live at the intersection of legal obligations and operational realities. Every day, you balance the promise of risk transfer in your contracts with the practical burden of validating third-party coverage. In General Liability & Construction and Property & Homeowners programs, that means thousands of certificates of insurance (COIs), endorsements, and vendor onboarding documents flowing through your organization. The challenge: find non-compliance and lapsed coverage before a loss hits—and do it at scale, without adding headcount.

Nomad Data’s Doc Chat changes the math. It’s an AI-powered, enterprise-grade certificate of insurance compliance tool that ingests entire inboxes, portals, and shared drives, then reviews every COI and related document against your contract requirements. In minutes, Doc Chat flags gaps—missing additional insured endorsements, absent primary and noncontributory language, waiver of subrogation issues, insufficient limits, and expired or soon-to-expire policies—so your team can find lapsed COI coverage at scale and act before risk becomes loss. If you’re searching for ways to AI audit certificates of insurance reliably, quickly, and defensibly, this is how the modern risk transfer desk operates.

Why COI Compliance Is Uniquely Hard in Construction and Property

COI compliance looks straightforward until you dive into the details. In General Liability & Construction, one prime contract can spawn hundreds of subcontractor agreements, each with its own insurance exhibit. Requirements vary by job site, jurisdiction, and trade. Meanwhile, in Property & Homeowners contexts—think HOAs, property managers, and REITs—you’re validating coverage for vendors performing work on premises, for homeowners bringing contractors into common areas, and for tenants with lease-driven insurance obligations. Across both lines, your burden is the same: ensure your organization is protected before someone gets hurt or property is damaged.

COIs complicate that mission. An ACORD 25 Certificate of Liability Insurance or ACORD 28 Evidence of Commercial Property Insurance is informational only; it does not amend coverage or confer rights. The protection you rely on—Additional Insured status (CG 20 10 for ongoing operations; CG 20 37 for completed operations), Primary & Noncontributory (CG 20 01 or carrier-specific forms), and Waiver of Subrogation (e.g., CG 24 04)—lives in the policy endorsements, not the certificate. That means a proper audit must trace COI statements back to underlying endorsements and match those endorsements to your insurance exhibit or MSA.

Scale and variability compound the problem. Vendor legal names rarely match W-9s or contract signatories exactly; policy numbers change at renewal; carriers have different naming for identical coverage obligations; and cancellation provisions may be promised on a COI but absent from the policy (and, even when endorsed, notice periods are often shorter than the "30-day notice" aspirational language on certificates). Add in Workers’ Compensation statutory coverage and Employers’ Liability limits; Commercial Auto requirements (with symbols and endorsements like CA 20 48 for additional insureds); Umbrella/Excess forms; and special exposures like Builder’s Risk, Installation Floater, or Pollution coverage, and a supposedly simple COI review becomes a maze.

The Manual Process Today—and Why It Breaks

Most Contractual Risk Managers describe a manual loop that looks like this:

Vendors email COIs and attachments to a shared inbox. A coordinator downloads the PDFs, renames them, and drags them into folders tied to projects or vendors. Someone opens each COI, scans the boxes and dates, compares limits to a requirements matrix, checks if the named insured matches the vendor record, and then hunts through attached endorsements to confirm the promised protections actually exist. Missing endorsements kick off back-and-forth emails with the vendor and their broker. Renewals are tracked in a spreadsheet or RMIS task list. When something expires, reminders go out—sometimes late. If volume spikes, backlogs form. If someone is out sick, everything slows down.

At small volumes, this can work. But for construction and property operations with hundreds or thousands of active vendors, it’s brittle and risky. Humans get tired and miss details. COI language is inconsistent. Endorsements hide in long, poorly labeled PDFs. And the moment work begins before compliance is validated—or coverage lapses mid-project—your named insured shoulders risk it never intended to keep.

What Must Be Checked on Every COI (and Why)

Whether you’re auditing a drywall subcontractor for a high-rise build or a landscaper for a homeowners association, the control points are largely the same. For General Liability & Construction and Property & Homeowners programs, Contractual Risk Managers typically validate:

  • Named Insured and Legal Entity Match: Does the insured name align to the entity signing your MSA/SOW or vendor onboarding record?
  • Policy Effective/Expiration Dates: Is coverage current for the period of performance, with no gaps since mobilization?
  • Limits and Coverage Types: GL (e.g., $1M per occurrence/$2M aggregate; per-project aggregate where required), Auto (hired/non-owned where applicable), Workers’ Comp (statutory) and Employers’ Liability, Umbrella/Excess, and Property/Builder’s Risk where contractually obligated.
  • Additional Insured: Ongoing operations (CG 20 10) and completed operations (CG 20 37), or carrier equivalents, naming your entity (and sometimes the owner and GC) as AI.
  • Primary & Noncontributory: An endorsement (e.g., CG 20 01) establishing your coverage priority relative to vendor coverage.
  • Waiver of Subrogation: Endorsement for GL/Auto/WC as required (e.g., CG 24 04; WC waiver on state-specific forms).
  • Additional Requirements: Per-project/per-location aggregate, notice of cancellation endorsement, no residential exclusions for certain trades, pollution for environmental work, professional for design exposures, and inland marine for equipment.
  • Carrier Financial Strength: AM Best rating meets your minimum (commonly A- VII or better), and admitted/non-admitted status per jurisdictional needs.

None of these are reliably confirmed by a COI alone. They demand endorsement-level validation and cross-reference to contract language—precisely where manual workflows tend to fail at scale.

How Doc Chat Automates COI Compliance End-to-End

Doc Chat by Nomad Data is a suite of AI agents designed to take the grind out of document-heavy insurance processes. For COI compliance in General Liability & Construction and Property & Homeowners, Doc Chat performs a full-stack audit:

1) Intake and Classification

Doc Chat ingests documents from shared inboxes, SFTP, vendor portals, RMIS exports, and cloud drives. It auto-detects COIs (e.g., ACORD 25, ACORD 28), homeowners evidence (for unit-owner contractors), endorsements (GL/Auto/WC/Excess), policy dec pages, contract agreements (MSA/PSA/SOW), and vendor onboarding documents (W-9, vendor questionnaire, insurance exhibits). Files are indexed to the vendor and project, even when naming conventions are inconsistent.

2) Requirements Mapping

Doc Chat reads your insurance exhibits, master service agreements, and scopes of work to derive a requirements matrix: coverage types, limits, endorsements, cancellation stipulations, AI wording, waiver needs, and acceptable carrier ratings. Unlike template matchers, Doc Chat applies contextual reasoning to variable contract language—see Nomad Data’s explanation of inference-driven document intelligence in Beyond Extraction: Why Document Scraping Isn’t Just Web Scraping for PDFs.

3) Endorsement-Level Validation

For every promise the COI makes, Doc Chat looks for the underlying endorsement and confirms it’s the correct form (e.g., CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 for GL AI status; CG 20 01 for P&N; CG 24 04 for waiver; auto symbols and additional insured endorsements like CA 20 48 where required). It verifies your entity is named appropriately and flags mismatches or broad limitations (e.g., blanket AI restricted by written contract scope that doesn’t align with your SOW).

4) Expiration and Lapse Detection

Doc Chat extracts effective/expiration dates across GL, Auto, WC, Umbrella, and Property lines, compares them to project timelines, and creates a renewal calendar. If coverage is missing, expiring within your look-ahead window, or has already lapsed, Doc Chat flags the vendor and can trigger broker outreach with your approved language. This is how teams reliably find lapsed COI coverage at scale.

5) Real-Time Q&A Across the Entire File

Need a fast answer? Ask natural language questions like: "List vendors on Project Elm who lack completed operations AI," "Which vendors do not show per-project aggregate?" or "Show all WC policies expiring within 30 days for Region 2." Doc Chat returns answers linked to exact pages for auditability. The same real-time capability that accelerates complex claims at carriers like GAIG (see Great American Insurance Group’s story) is applied here to COI compliance.

6) Outputs and System Integration

Doc Chat exports structured results to spreadsheets, dashboards, or your RMIS/ERP (e.g., compliance status, exceptions, renewal dates, missing endorsements). Teams can work exceptions by criticality—life safety trades, high-severity jobs, or vendors mobilizing next week—without digging through PDFs.

Business Impact for Contractual Risk Managers

Nomad Data built Doc Chat to eliminate the bottlenecks that slow down risk transfer and drive loss. In COI workflows, that translates to measurable outcomes:

  • Cycle Time: Move from days or weeks of manual review to minutes. Entire vendor populations—thousands of COIs and endorsements—are audited in a single pass.
  • Cost Reduction: Slash manual touchpoints, overtime, and third-party compliance vendor spend. Reallocate internal talent from data entry to strategic vendor risk management.
  • Accuracy: Endorsement-level validation means fewer blind spots: no relying on COI promises without proof. Consistent extraction eliminates human error and drift across reviewers.
  • Scalability: Seasonal spikes, new projects, or portfolio acquisitions no longer require temporary staff. Doc Chat ingests surge volumes instantly.
  • Risk Reduction: Tight risk transfer reduces claims leakage. When a loss occurs, you’re positioned to tender early—armed with verified AI/waiver/P&N endorsements and current policy limits.

Doc Chat’s ability to read every page with equal attention—whether page 1 or page 1,500—has already ended document bottlenecks elsewhere in insurance. See how medical file reviews dropped from weeks to minutes in The End of Medical File Review Bottlenecks, and why automating the data-entry backbone of COI operations unlocks outsized ROI in AI’s Untapped Goldmine: Automating Data Entry.

What Makes COI Automation in GL/Construction and Property Different

Doc Chat is not a point solution that reads a COI header and hopes the rest checks out. It is a purpose-built, insurance-trained platform designed to handle the messy realities of third-party risk transfer:

Complex, inconsistent endorsements: Construction trades use different carriers and unique forms. Doc Chat recognizes carrier-variant endorsements, maps them to your required obligations, and flags restrictive wording that weakens your intended protection (e.g., AI granted only if "required by written contract" when your SOW lacks explicit language—Doc Chat will spot and elevate this).

Per-project and per-location aggregates: Many jobs mandate per-project GL aggregates (e.g., CG 25 03 or equivalent). Doc Chat confirms these are present where required and highlights aggregate erosion risks across multi-site portfolios.

Property and homeowners nuances: In HOA and property management contexts, Doc Chat checks if vendors entering common areas maintain appropriate GL/Auto/WC, confirms carriers meet rating thresholds, and verifies property or inland marine coverage for high-value equipment used on premises.

Regulatory and carrier changes: Form names and availability evolve. Doc Chat’s agents learn from your real documents and playbooks, so changes in endorsement form numbers or language are tracked and incorporated quickly.

The Manual vs. Automated COI Workflow

Manual Today

Reviewers read PDFs one at a time, sometimes opening 10–20 attachments per vendor, reconciling against a shared spreadsheet of requirements. Notes get siloed in emails. A second reviewer may apply criteria differently. Follow-up with brokers is ad hoc. Reporting is after-the-fact and always incomplete during surges. Lapses slip by until someone notices an expired date or a claim reveals a missing endorsement.

Automated with Doc Chat

Everything is ingested; everything is reviewed. The system standardizes what your best reviewer does, then makes that approach universal. It creates a living compliance view of your vendor base that updates whenever new documents arrive. You get proactive alerts on expiring policies, pre-built email language for immediate outreach, and dashboards that show the exact risk posture of every project and property.

Example Prompts Contractual Risk Managers Use Daily

The power of Doc Chat’s real-time Q&A is that it fits how Contractual Risk Managers actually think. Common questions include:

  • "List all vendors on the Westline Tower project with GL AI for ongoing ops but missing completed ops (CG 20 37)."
  • "Which vendors show a COI stating Primary & Noncontributory but have no corresponding endorsement?"
  • "Show me all vendors whose Umbrella/Excess expires within 45 days across our Southeast properties."
  • "Identify any vendor where the named insured does not match the legal entity on our vendor onboarding file or MSA."
  • "Which vendors lack per-project aggregate on GL where our contract requires it? Provide source pages."
  • "Cite all instances where a carrier rating is below A- VII."

Each answer is returned with page-level citations and source links so your audit, legal, and compliance teams can verify in seconds.

Proactive Risk Transfer: From Backlog to Advantage

When the market is hardening and losses are costly, superior risk transfer drives material results. Doc Chat establishes a proactive rhythm:

Before mobilization: Validate AI/waiver/P&N endorsements are in place for the right entities; confirm limits and per-project aggregates; ensure WC/EL and Auto coverage match scope of work; verify equipment or builder’s risk where relevant.

During performance: Monitor expirations and mid-term endorsements; identify restrictive language introduced at renewal; watch for gaps as sub-subcontractors enter the site or vendors add new services at properties.

At claim: Tender early with a clean packet: COI, endorsements, dec pages, and contract excerpts. Doc Chat pulls a complete tender file in minutes, putting your organization in the best position to shift costs to the proper policy.

Security, Explainability, and Compliance

Any tool touching vendor insurance documents must be secure and defensible. Doc Chat maintains rigorous controls, delivers page-level citations for every conclusion, and creates a verifiable audit trail aligned to your internal policies. That transparency mirrors what leading carriers demand in claims operations—see how explainability enables oversight in GAIG’s AI transformation.

Why Nomad Data Is the Best Partner for COI Automation

Volume: Doc Chat ingests entire document populations—thousands of pages per minute—so reviews move from days to minutes without adding headcount.

Complexity: COI audits are not just data extraction; they require inference across inconsistent endorsements and contract language. Doc Chat was built for this, as explained in Beyond Extraction.

The Nomad Process: We train Doc Chat on your playbooks, insurance exhibits, and vendor categories so the output matches your standards from day one.

Real-Time Q&A: Ask for any slice of your vendor universe—by project, property, trade, or risk criteria—and get answers instantly with citations.

Thorough & Complete: Every reference to coverage, endorsements, limits, and dates is surfaced. Nothing important slips through the cracks.

White-Glove Delivery with Fast Time-to-Value: Our team handles onboarding, document pipeline setup, and configuration, with most programs live in 1–2 weeks. We integrate with your existing RMIS, ERP, and content repositories to fit your workflows—no heavy engineering cycles required.

AI Audit Certificates of Insurance: What Success Looks Like

Contractual Risk Managers measure success in fewer exceptions, cleaner vendor starts, and better claim outcomes. With Doc Chat in place, teams report:

  • 80–95% reduction in manual review time per vendor file, depending on complexity and endorsement depth.
  • Near-zero backlog at peak periods because surge volumes are machine-reviewed in minutes.
  • Earlier vendor mobilization from faster compliance decisions (onboarding moves from days to same-day for fully compliant vendors).
  • Fewer late renewals and surprise lapses thanks to proactive, automated reminders and exception routing.
  • Improved tendering leverage at time of loss due to complete, verified endorsement evidence built during onboarding.

These outcomes align with the broader transformations Nomad Data customers experience across claims and document-heavy processes—where multi-week reviews drop to minutes and accuracy increases as page counts rise. Explore the cross-functional benefits in Reimagining Claims Processing Through AI Transformation.

How It Works in Practice: A Day in the Life

Imagine your GL/Construction program launching two new jobsites while your Property portfolio adds a slate of seasonal vendors:

By 8 a.m., Doc Chat has already swept the inbox and SFTP for overnight COIs and endorsements. It classifies each document, updates vendor records, and scores compliance against the insurance exhibits for each SOW. A dashboard shows 61 vendors fully compliant, 18 with minor exceptions (e.g., missing per-project aggregate endorsement), and 7 with high-severity gaps (e.g., no completed ops AI). The system pre-populates broker outreach emails with your approved language and attaches the annotated exception list with page citations.

A superintendent at Project Maple requests mobilization clearance for two subs. You ask Doc Chat: "Are Sub A and Sub B cleared for mobilization?" It responds: "Sub A: Yes (all requirements met). Sub B: Not cleared—missing CG 20 37 and Umbrella expires in 15 days; see pages X and Y." You forward the outreach note Doc Chat prepared to the broker and mark Sub B as pending.

At noon, Legal flags a claim from a slip-and-fall at a property you manage. You ask Doc Chat for the vendor tender packet. In minutes, it compiles the COI, GL dec page, AI/waiver/P&N endorsements, and the relevant contract clause—all ready for your TPA or carrier to tender to the vendor’s insurer. What used to require hours of digging is now a few clicks.

Implementation: Fast, Supported, and Low Lift

Nomad Data is your partner in AI, not just a software vendor. We couple advanced agents with white-glove delivery:

1–2 week deployment: We configure Doc Chat to your insurance exhibits, endorsement requirements, and vendor categories. No data science team required.

Drop-in start: Begin with drag-and-drop or email ingestion; layer in SFTP, RMIS, or ERP integrations as you go. We meet you where you are.

Training on your playbooks: We codify exactly how your best reviewers work, including edge cases. This institutionalizes expertise and standardizes outcomes across your team.

Security and governance: Enterprise-grade controls and page-level citations. Your compliance and audit teams get the transparency they need from day one.

From Compliance Burden to Competitive Advantage

COI compliance is often seen as a cost center. But with the right automation, it becomes a strategic lever. For Contractual Risk Managers in General Liability & Construction and Property & Homeowners:

• Your organization gains speed to mobilization without compromising standards.
• Your vendor base stays continuously compliant, not just compliant at onboarding.
• Your claims posture improves through earlier, cleaner tenders backed by verified endorsements.
• Your team spends time on exceptions and negotiation—not on file hunting and data entry.

In an environment where losses are costly and capacity is tight, that combination is a real edge.

Ready to Find Lapsed COI Coverage at Scale?

If you’re evaluating tools to AI audit certificates of insurance and want a certificate of insurance compliance tool that handles messy, real-world documents with endorsement-level rigor, Doc Chat was built for you. See how it ingests entire vendor populations, validates every requirement in your insurance exhibit, and gives you real-time answers with page-level citations. Visit Doc Chat for Insurance to learn more, or connect with us to run a sample audit of your current COI backlog.

Turn COI compliance from a stop sign into a green light for safe mobilization—and put risk transfer back where it belongs.

Learn More