Automated Treaty Review: Using AI to Analyze Facultative and Treaty Reinsurance Contracts in Minutes - Reinsurance Contract Manager

Automated Treaty Review: Using AI to Analyze Facultative and Treaty Reinsurance Contracts in Minutes - Reinsurance Contract Manager
At Nomad Data we help you automate document heavy processes in your business. From document information extraction to comparisons to summaries across hundreds of thousands of pages, we can help in the most tedious and nuanced document use cases.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Automated Treaty Review: Using AI to Analyze Facultative and Treaty Reinsurance Contracts in Minutes

Reinsurance treaty documents are long, dense, and inconsistent—exactly the kind of paperwork that overwhelms even the most seasoned Reinsurance Contract Manager. In a single renewal season, you might face hundreds of pages per contract across Facultative Reinsurance Agreements, Proportional Reinsurance Treaties, Excess of Loss Treaties, Slip Policies, and Cover Notes—each with distinct clause numbering, terminology, and endorsements. The challenge is simple to state but hard to fix: you need reliable answers about coverage, exclusions, limits, commissions, and special provisions right now, not after a week of manual reading.

Nomad Data’s Doc Chat was built to solve this exact problem for reinsurance. Doc Chat for Insurance ingests entire treaty files—including slips, wordings, broker emails, endorsements, schedules, and statements of account—then instantly surfaces precise answers with page-level citations. Whether you need to cross-compare a new excess of loss wording against last year’s treaty, extract exclusions from a facultative certificate, or reconcile a cover note with a signed slip, Doc Chat turns days of reading into minutes of results.

Why Treaty Review Is Uniquely Complex for a Reinsurance Contract Manager

Reinsurance is a different world from primary insurance. A Reinsurance Contract Manager must navigate layered placements, market reform contract (MRC) structures, broker idiosyncrasies, jurisdictional nuances, and divergent expectations from cedents and reinsurers. Complexity multiplies when multiple markets sign different lines, endorsements revise clauses mid-term, and claims settlements hinge on how a single term—like “ultimate net loss,” “occurrence,” or “hours clause”—is defined. In proportional deals you track ceding commission formulas, sliding scales, loss corridors, and profit commissions; in XOL programs you scrutinize retentions, AAD/AAL, reinstatements, and aggregation language. Even the same clause may appear with different numbering across a slip policy, a treaty wording, and a cover note.

Then there’s version sprawl. The slip you bound, the wording you received, the broker’s placement memo, the post-bind endorsement pack, the cedent’s statement of account, and the claim advice months later all refer to the “contract,” but they’re not the same document. A Reinsurance Contract Manager must reconcile them—line by line—to protect intent and avoid disputes. Meanwhile, cyber and communicable disease exclusions evolve, sanctions language tightens, and model warranties shift. Missing a single carve-back or cumulative exposure definition can create material leakage or disputes during recovery.

How the Process Is Handled Manually Today

Most reinsurance contract teams still power through with manual reading, ad hoc spreadsheets, and institutional memory. A typical workflow spans intake, review, comparison, extraction, and signoff, consuming hours per contract and introducing risk at each handoff.

In practice, the manual process often includes:

  • Collecting artifacts from multiple channels—Slip Policies, Cover Notes, full treaty wordings, endorsements, security schedules, broker emails, and PDF scans.
  • Reading PDFs line by line to locate critical terms: subject business, inception/expiry, territory, definitions of “occurrence” and “ultimate net loss,” hours clause, reinstatement provisions, retentions, limits (per event and aggregate), and claims control/claims cooperation clauses.
  • For proportional treaties, manually pulling ceding commission rates, sliding-scale mechanics, loss corridor thresholds, and profit commission conditions, then reconciling with examples in broker presentations.
  • For excess of loss, locating deductibles, AAD/AAL, franchise language, vertical/horizontal aggregation rules, hours or event clauses, extra-contractual obligations language, exclusions (war, terrorism, cyber, communicable disease), and any cut-through or offset provisions.
  • Cross-comparing renewal wording against expiring terms and against the bound slip, ensuring no silent changes to retrocession, reporting obligations, or sanction clauses.
  • Building a summary and checklist, copying/pasting text into spreadsheets, and emailing findings for internal review and sign-off.

This approach is slow, expensive, and error-prone. Clause numbering and structure vary across documents; broker and market terminology change; and critical nuances hide in appendices and endorsements. When volumes surge during renewal, even elite teams fall behind. And because there is limited time, many reviews prioritize only headline terms—leaving embedded sub-clauses or carve-backs potentially unexamined.

AI for Reviewing Reinsurance Treaties PDF: How Doc Chat Automates End-to-End Treaty Analysis

Doc Chat transforms unstructured reinsurance documentation into structured, trusted intelligence with explainability. It ingests entire treaty files—thousands of pages including Facultative Reinsurance Agreements, Proportional Reinsurance Treaties, Excess of Loss Treaties, Slip Policies, Cover Notes, endorsements, schedules, and even loss bordereaux—and answers complex questions in seconds. Every answer is traceable, with citations linking back to exact page locations so reviewers can verify instantly.

Here’s how Doc Chat automates the workflow for a Reinsurance Contract Manager:

  • Automated intake and classification: Doc Chat detects document types (slip, wording, endorsement, cover note, SOA, bordereau) and normalizes naming, so you always know what you’re reviewing.
  • Clause and term extraction: Ask “List all exclusions” or “What is the hours clause?” to see the clause text, definitions, and related endorsements—across all uploaded documents.
  • Renewal comparison: Instantly compare renewal wording to expiring treaty or slip. Differences in limits, retentions, definitions, commissions, or exclusions are highlighted with citations.
  • Proportional analytics: Extract ceding commissions, sliding scale bands, loss corridors, profit commissions, caps, and examples into a structured table that can be exported.
  • Excess of loss specifics: Surface retentions, per-occurrence and aggregate limits, AAD/AAL, reinstatement mechanics and costs, occurrence definitions, and aggregation language.
  • Real-time Q&A: Ask natural-language questions like “Does the cut-through clause apply to ceded facultative certificates?” or “Is cyber excluded, and are there carve-backs for non-malicious events?” and get immediate, source-cited answers.
  • Portfolio-scale processing: Review an entire binder or program in minutes. Doc Chat handles the volume and complexity that stall manual teams.

Unlike generic tools, Doc Chat is trained on your playbooks and standards—the exact way your reinsurance team evaluates contracts. That means your terminology, your checklists, and your guardrails inform every review. This is the essence of Nomad’s “purpose-built agents” approach for insurance documentation.

Automate Treaty Slip Comparison in Reinsurance—From Slip to Signed Wording

Slips get you bound; wordings govern your rights. Differences between the two can be costly, and reconciliations are tedious. With Doc Chat, you can load the Slip Policy, Cover Note, and final signed wording into a single workspace and run a comprehensive comparison. The agent flags language that appears in one but not the other, highlights changed definitions (e.g., “occurrence” vs. “event”), and maps exclusions to their endorsements or carve-backs. If you work with layered placements, Doc Chat can also segment comparisons by layer and market, helping you confirm that each layer’s signed wording aligns with the bound terms and signed lines.

For the Reinsurance Contract Manager, this means less time reconciling documents and more time validating intent and protecting the company’s position. It also means better governance: your audit trail shows exactly how differences were identified and resolved, with page-level citations you can share with brokers or markets when needed.

Extract Exclusions from Reinsurance Contract—With Explainable AI

When a cedent reports a loss, disputes often center on exclusions and how definitions interact. Doc Chat accelerates this analysis by compiling exclusions into a single, structured list, while linking to their full text and any relevant endorsements. If you ask, “Show all communicable disease exclusions and any carve-backs for government-mandated shutdowns,” Doc Chat returns a complete answer with citations. If you ask, “Are cyber events excluded, and is silent cyber addressed?” it surfaces the operative language and related definitions that drive interpretation.

Because Doc Chat maintains context across the entire treaty file—including endorsements that may modify the base wording—you avoid the common trap of reading a standalone clause without its modifying instruments. The AI does not replace judgment; rather, it guarantees you have every relevant piece on the table before you apply judgment.

Facultative Agreement Clause Extraction AI—Precision at the Certificate Level

Facultative placements can be especially variable, with bespoke terms tucked inside broker emails, Cover Notes, and short-form certificates. Doc Chat’s facultative agreement clause extraction AI targets these realities. Ask, “What is the attachment and limit on this fac certificate, and how does the definition of ‘occurrence’ differ from the underlying policy?” The agent extracts and compares the relevant text, revealing any silent gaps or contradictions. If cut-through or offset rights matter to your organization, Doc Chat can be trained to always flag whether such terms are present, undefined, or explicitly excluded.

When facultative certificates are endorsed mid-term, Doc Chat maps the changes and shows how they interact with the original certificate and any referenced underlying wording. For a Reinsurance Contract Manager, this eliminates version-control anxiety and gives you day-one clarity on what you actually bound.

The Business Impact: Time, Cost, Accuracy, and Defensibility

Automation is not just faster; it’s measurably better. Doc Chat removes bottlenecks in treaty review, improves accuracy by reading every page with equal rigor, and provides defensible, verifiable outputs for internal and external stakeholders. Our clients routinely see reviews shrink from days to minutes while improving quality and consistency.

These outcomes are consistent with what Nomad Data customers experience across other high-volume insurance use cases. For instance, claims teams using Nomad have cut review cycles from days to minutes while maintaining page-level explanations, as detailed in Great American Insurance Group’s case study. And in medical record review contexts—often larger and more variable than treaty documents—Nomad has eliminated long-standing bottlenecks, as discussed in The End of Medical File Review Bottlenecks.

At an operational level, reinsurance teams report benefits such as:

Time savings: From multi-day treaty reads to minutes-long comparisons and summaries—freeing contract managers to focus on negotiation, risk assessment, and dispute avoidance. In document-heavy environments, Nomad’s throughput has been measured at hundreds of thousands of pages per minute, with on-demand Q&A that delivers instant answers with citations (see Reimagining Claims Processing Through AI Transformation).

Cost reduction: Fewer hours spent on manual extraction and reconciliation. Teams avoid external review costs for routine tasks, and staff can absorb seasonal surges without overtime or temporary hires—an efficiency profile echoed broadly in AI’s Untapped Goldmine: Automating Data Entry.

Accuracy improvements: The machine does not fatigue. It reads page 1,500 as carefully as page 1 and preserves context across endorsements and schedules. This consistency helps catch subtle misalignments—like changes in definition placement, unreferenced endorsements, or exclusions partially modified elsewhere—that humans routinely miss under time pressure.

Defensibility and trust: Because every answer links back to specific pages, legal, compliance, and market partners can verify conclusions quickly. Page-level explainability is a cornerstone of successful adoption across regulated insurance functions (see GAIG’s experience).

How Doc Chat Delivers Results Where Other Tools Stall

Generic “document summarizers” struggle with reinsurance because the work is not mere extraction—it’s inference across heterogeneous, sometimes contradictory documents. As Nomad discusses in Beyond Extraction: Why Document Scraping Isn’t Just Web Scraping for PDFs, the reinsurance task requires systems that can connect the breadcrumbs—identifying a clause in the wording, its modifying endorsement, and a conflicting representation in a slip—and then reason about their interplay. Doc Chat’s purpose-built agents are trained on your team’s playbooks so they “think” like your best contract managers, not like a generic PDF reader.

This is precisely why our solution is a fit for high-intent workflows like “AI for reviewing reinsurance treaties PDF,” “automate treaty slip comparison in reinsurance,” “extract exclusions from reinsurance contract,” and “facultative agreement clause extraction AI.” Doc Chat operationalizes these use cases with enterprise-grade scale, resilience, and auditability.

Manual vs. Automated: A Side-by-Side View for the Reinsurance Contract Manager

In the manual world, you copy/paste clauses into a spreadsheet, annotate PDFs, and email questions back to brokers. In the automated world, you ask Doc Chat directly: “Compare expiring and renewal wordings. List every change to occurrence definition, hours clause, AAD/AAL, and cyber exclusion. Show the exact language and where it lives.” In seconds, you have a redline-like report with citations. Follow-up questions refine the view—“Include reinstatement cost structures and whether they are pro rata as to amount and time”—and Doc Chat updates instantly.

With proportional treaties, a similar story plays out. Instead of calculating sliding-scale bands by hand, Doc Chat extracts every band, base commission, step-down thresholds, profit commission interplay, and any loss corridor mechanics, assembling the data into a structured table you can export to Excel or feed into internal systems. The risk of missing a single footnote that adjusts the commission formula vanishes because Doc Chat will surface and cite it.

From Review to Decision: Embedding Doc Chat in Reinsurance Workflows

Doc Chat fits naturally into the placement and renewal cycle:

Pre-bind: Analyze broker submissions, Slip Policies, and Cover Notes. Confirm intent and surface any ambiguous or missing terms before sign-off.

Post-bind: Load signed wordings and endorsements. Run automated reconciliation against the slip to confirm alignment and identify residual discrepancies for immediate resolution.

Mid-term changes: When endorsements arrive, Doc Chat maps the change, shows affected clauses, and updates your comparative summary.

Claims and recoveries: During a loss, ask targeted questions—“Does the aggregation language allow hours clause stacking across sub-perils?”—and trace the answer with citations to support reserves, coverage positions, and market communications.

Security, Compliance, and Governance for Reinsurance Documents

Reinsurance documents contain sensitive policyholder and market information. Nomad Data’s enterprise controls, including SOC 2 Type 2 practices, protect your data. Answers are always accompanied by page references to keep human experts in the loop and ensure decisions remain auditable and defensible. IT teams can roll out Doc Chat initially via drag-and-drop and then integrate through APIs to your document repositories, workflow tools, and downstream systems. As we describe in our customer stories, this phased path delivers immediate value while enabling deeper automation over time.

Why Nomad Data Is the Best Solution for Reinsurance Treaty Review

Several qualities set Nomad apart:

Volume and complexity: Doc Chat ingests entire treaty files and their supporting artifacts at once, answering questions across the full set. This removes bottlenecks during renewal surges.

Customization to your playbooks: We codify your team’s checklists and red flags. The output reflects your standards—from how to present commissions to how to reconcile limit language across endorsements.

Real-time Q&A with citations: Your team can ask, “Does the sanctions clause reference OFAC and EU regimes?” and receive a precise, cite-backed answer immediately.

White-glove, low-friction implementation: Our team engages directly with your Reinsurance Contract Managers to learn their processes, tuning Doc Chat to your workflows. Typical implementation runs 1–2 weeks from kickoff to production and requires minimal IT lift—an approach aligned with how we’ve accelerated adoption for other insurance clients, as outlined in AI for Insurance: Real-World AI Use Cases Driving Transformation.

Your partner in AI: We co-create with you. As your treaty language evolves—new cyber wordings, new communicable disease carve-backs, shifting sanctions language—Doc Chat evolves with it. We institutionalize the judgment of your best performers, reducing variability and onboarding time for new staff.

Frequently Asked Treaty Scenarios Doc Chat Handles

Doc Chat’s agents address the specific treaty tasks Reinsurance Contract Managers and analysts face every day:

Renewal redline: “Compare renewal wording to expiring. Summarize changes to occurrence definition, aggregation, hours clause, and reinstatement costs.”

Proportional mechanics: “Extract base commission, sliding-scale bands, loss corridor terms, profit commission rules, and any caps, with examples.”

Excess of loss details: “List retention, per-occurrence limit, aggregate limit, AAD/AAL and whether it’s eroding or non-eroding, and outline aggregation provisions.”

Facultative reconciliation: “Confirm fac certificate aligns with cover note and underlying policy. Flag differences in definitions and any absent cut-through or offset rights.”

Exclusions and carve-backs: “Show all cyber and communicable disease exclusions and any carve-backs for non-malicious events or mandated closures.”

Sanctions, claims cooperation/control, governing law/jurisdiction: “Extract the full text and highlight any mismatch between slip and wording.”

From Insights to Systems: Structured Outputs for Reinsurance Operations

Doc Chat doesn’t just answer questions—it produces outputs you can use across systems and stakeholders. Commission tables, limit/retention matrices, exclusion inventories, and reconciliation checklists can be exported in your formats (Excel, CSV, JSON) and fed into contract repositories, workflow tools, or analytics. That means surveillance, QA, and audit can move from sampling to comprehensive oversight. When regulators or auditors ask for proof, you provide a page-linked trail of how every conclusion was reached.

Addressing Common Concerns: Accuracy, Bias, and “Hallucinations”

In contract review, the source of truth is the page. Doc Chat is engineered to ground answers in your documents and show exactly where the facts came from. That page-level citation is the antidote to AI uncertainty. And because we configure the solution to follow your rules—not generic logic—you maintain control over how the AI interprets and presents treaty content. For more on why this inference-centric approach succeeds where keyword-based tools fail, see Beyond Extraction.

Implementation: Fast, White-Glove, and Built Around Your Team

We start by meeting with your Reinsurance Contract Managers to capture the unwritten rules in their heads—the subtle checks, the order of operations, and the exceptions that matter. We then encode those into Doc Chat’s agents along with your templates and preferred report structures. Most teams are live within 1–2 weeks, beginning with drag-and-drop pilots and then moving to API integration as needed. The outcome is a tool that fits like a glove, driving immediate adoption and measurable time-to-value.

Measuring Value: From Backlog Relief to Better Market Relationships

Speed matters during renewal, but consistency solidifies credibility. With Doc Chat, you eliminate last-minute scrambles, reduce review backlogs, and give brokers and markets faster, clearer responses. When you can cite the exact page and paragraph for any point in seconds, negotiations become quicker and more precise. Inside the organization, knowledge becomes institutionalized—new team members ramp faster, and seasoned Contract Managers can focus on the tough calls rather than repetitive extraction work. These benefits mirror outcomes our clients have realized in other insurance processes where Doc Chat supports high-volume, high-stakes documentation at enterprise scale.

How to Get Started

Getting started is simple:

1) Identify a representative set of treaty documents—Proportional Reinsurance Treaties, Excess of Loss Treaties, Facultative Agreements, Slip Policies, and Cover Notes—plus a few tricky renewals and endorsements you know well.

2) In a pilot session, upload them to Doc Chat for Insurance and ask the exact questions you ask daily. Use known answers to benchmark performance, just as claims teams have done in our other deployments.

3) We configure Doc Chat to your standards—your checklists, your summary formats, your escalation rules—then roll it out to additional users and integrate into your document repositories.

In parallel, consider how Doc Chat can help downstream: validating statements of account, accelerating bordereaux checks, or supporting dispute-prevention memos with precise citations. Many reinsurance groups find that once treaty review is automated, adjacent workflows become ripe for transformation.

The Bottom Line

For Reinsurance Contract Managers, speed without accuracy is dangerous; accuracy without speed is impractical. Doc Chat delivers both. It reads every page, finds every relevant clause, and answers your most nuanced questions with transparent citations—at the pace your renewal calendar demands. From “AI for reviewing reinsurance treaties PDF” to “automate treaty slip comparison in reinsurance,” “extract exclusions from reinsurance contract,” and “facultative agreement clause extraction AI,” Nomad Data’s purpose-built agents turn manual, repetitive treaty work into a fast, reliable, and defensible process.

When your next complex treaty hits your inbox, don’t wade through it alone. Bring an AI partner that’s been trained to work like your best Reinsurance Contract Manager—at scale. Explore Doc Chat for Insurance and see how minutes can replace days in your treaty review cycle.

Learn More